Comments on: Taxi Driver Refuses Guide Dog Owner For ‘Religious’ Reasons https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/ Home of Stephen Knight and The #GSPodcast Sat, 19 Aug 2017 14:59:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.4 By: ALDI Supermarket Questioned Over ‘No Alcohol’ Till Sign | Godless Spellchecker's Blog https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-7908 Sat, 19 Aug 2017 14:59:25 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-7908 […] and pork products whilst working for non-religious supermarkets are not uncommon. Back in 2016 I also reported on taxi drivers refusing to take passengers with guide dogs for ‘religious reasons’. This ended […]

]]>
By: ptfrd https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-7817 Wed, 21 Jun 2017 19:25:16 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-7817 It was amusing to see the Guardian try to cover this issue a couple of weeks ago. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/08/guide-dog-taxis-uber-illegal-drivers They go into great depth about the relevant laws, regulations, variations around the country, etc.. But as for the cause? The article doesn’t mention Islam once. Apparently the problem is mostly a “cultural misunderstanding”! (I would actually bet that the percentage of drivers who misunderstand what a guide dog is, or that refusing one is illegal, is very close to zero.)

]]>
By: Stephen Knight https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-6941 Wed, 07 Sep 2016 09:34:37 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-6941 In reply to John.

I don’t think it’s a good idea to be making concessions for personal religious dogmas – as where does that end? Can they refuse service to homosexuals? Women? A case could be made for both with reference to religious conviction. You either do the job you’re paid to do or look elsewhere for another. That’s a much more sensible (and fairer) approach to these issues.

]]>
By: John https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-6939 Wed, 07 Sep 2016 03:48:34 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-6939 I understand religion and maybe it makes them feel sinful or forced into something illegal. Beliefs and ways of your family are hard to unlearn. Maybe there should be a disclosure for certain taxi companies that some drivers may not accept for religious reasons. Or another can company might advertise TO be accepting of service animals. Problem solve and be the better company and then the driver knows when they apply!

]]>
By: fairlycirrus https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-6432 Sun, 10 Jul 2016 04:31:12 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-6432 In reply to Stephen Knight.

Hi Stephen,
I was so distressed by this story I sent an email to the taxi company concerned. Here’s their reply:

“Thank you for your email, we deeply ashamed of the conduct of this Leicester City Council licensed driver, and he clearly broke the law, and has been dispensed with, as well as being reported to the council. The driver is now free to work for any firm he chooses. Our policy is clear, we do not discriminate, however in the taxi trade drivers are self employed and free to take work from any source, ie Uber / any other private hire firm. If we have drivers reported to us for breaking terms of their license, we cut them off from our bookings system and no longer use their service. The manager I believe is contacting the customer concerned, and will offer him a full apology and some free journeys.

Kind Regards
David Hunter”

Very pleased to have received that response. I guess that driver could well be out there on the roads, continuing his refusal to accept fares from dog-assisted blind people. But at least that incident has been noted and it might help to make this behaviour less acceptable.

]]>
By: HaryyR33 https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-6401 Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:51:19 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-6401 In reply to fairlycirrus.

fairlycirrus – I was seeking to contract the motivation of someone accustomed to a personal or cultural ( not necessarily meaning religious) exclusion of dogs or animals in general to an entirely mean-spirited cherry picking filtering of customers illustrated by my own anecdote.

I’ll add another, but from the other perspective – when I lived and worked in Leeds many years ago a taxi driver told me that drivers were in conflict with the local council as the drivers were reluctant to takes fares to one particular pert of town as once there and dropping the fare off they were too often subject to attack, robbery, physical assault and damage to their vehicle. The council insisted they couldn’t refuse to go to a specific part of town, the drivers were refusing. I don’t know how this was eventually resolved. In the same town when buying clothing for a my first adult skiing trip I couldn’t buy a ski mask as they were banned due to their popularity with local robbers.

]]>
By: HaryyR33 https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-6400 Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:41:20 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-6400 In reply to fairlycirrus.

Yes, services offered to the public should be offered without discrimination. I agree. My comment was too vague.

]]>
By: Stephen Knight https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-6386 Tue, 05 Jul 2016 05:39:37 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-6386 In reply to Helen1L.

I don’t think employers should be bending to religious dogmas. The drivers should either do their job in full, or be made to look for a new one

]]>
By: Helen1L https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-6385 Tue, 05 Jul 2016 02:34:47 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-6385 If it is a religious situation why don’t they just have “pet” as part of the uber pickup so this can be avoided in the future. It just makes sense and is an easy solution.

]]>
By: blabangida https://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/07/taxi-driver-refuses-guide-dog-owner-for-religious-reasons/#comment-6383 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 18:24:13 +0000 https://www.gspellchecker.com/?p=4170#comment-6383 There are differing lists of precisely what is considered impure/najasat.

Some include us infidels, right there betwen alcohol and vomit (good times!). Perhaps worth bearing in mind should either your carry out or corgie be refused entry to a taxi.

(Glad to see the GS blog making the NSS news feed btw.)

]]>