I recently engaged in a discussion with twitter user @ChallengeChurch, on this post which claimed “Science backs up Genesis 1”, among other considerable failings in rational thought. My feelings on this can be found here.
A further cringe inducing response was made by @ChallengeChurch, titled A response to “@gspellerchecker” (the irony) which is a rogues gallery of the usual fallacies put forward by the less informed theist.
I will address some of the “points” made. There is nothing new unfortunately, and each one falls into well established, rudimentary fallacy territory.
So if science sets out to disprove stuff, they have not YET disproved
the creation story
It is not the job of science to disprove every claim made. It is YOUR claim, it is YOUR responsibility to prove it. This is known as “The Burden Of Proof”. Please take time to educate yourself on how this means your claim lacks credibility.
For example, science is YET to disprove the existence of fairies. Does this lend credibility to their existence? This is precisely the strength of your flawed argument. For clarification, please see below: